This is not what Americans do.

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,


Image

This website exposes brutality and corruption that stands in stark contrast to our values as a nation. It chronicles a stain on our history that must never again be allowed to happen. This is not what Americans do.

We don’t torture.

We don’t have secret hearings in a criminal trial.

We don’t selectively follow the one part of a law and get to ignore all of the other parts.

We don’t allow lies and fraud in a court of the law for power.

We don’t send armed people to Citizen’s front doors demanding they “Take down the Face Books, and the Twitter.

Okay, maybe we do…but it is still wrong no matter how you look at it.

 

The essential elements of the crimes

Tags

, , , ,


Judge A. Howard Matz is Crackers

Judge A. Howard Matz is Crackers

The relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U. S., at 362.

This familiar standard gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.

Essential Elements

Whoever transmits

First essential element is transmits...

Did Elena J. Duarte and Debra Wong Yang have any facts or proof the accused “transmitted” anything?

The answer is NO.

But that didn’t slow the Selective Prosecution by Judge A. Howard Matz for his good friend Debra Yang by her associate Elena J. Duarte. Now one of them will die first, carrying their lie to the grave. Can you guess which one?

Hint: They are unstable mentally.

Kozinski and Matz are called to repentance


ahowardmatzheader.jpgI do this with a prayer that the Lord will do what has to be done and guide our actions, and with great reluctance, but also great resolve. I never thought I would be doing this, but I want to expose the truth about this fraud and deception and I would like to have some press and radio on it, immediately and until Kozinski and Matz are called to repentance.

My terms are simple. I have begged you to overturn the horrible decision in U.S. vs Sutcliffe, you have refused to listen or do anything about it, except threaten me and censor me. So I must take matters into my own hands now.

Where We Are Now.

I am going to prove the fraud by publishing all 8000 social security numbers, with their matching date of birth, addresses, phone numbers, etc., that Judge Elena J. Duarte gave me while lying to the courts and the American people she claimed to represent. That is my intent. Not to break the law, but to expose the Fraud on the Court to cover it all up.

I know it will shock and piss off a lot of honest, hard-working people, some to the point of threats, but so be it, the options are over.  And like Elena said, I “have to…”  And like Darcy says, “Ya made me.”

Stay tuned… because like Judge A. Howard Matz said in open court, “fundamental rights are going to be protected, but not all.

A. Howard Matz on T.V.

A. Howard Matz on T.V.

Suppressing Fundamental Human Rights

Tags

, , , ,


Judge A. Howard Matz and Alex Kozinski are all for Suppressing Fundamental Human Rights

One starts Suppressing Fundamental Human Rights by saying, “Fundamental  Rights are going to be protected, but not all.”  Google it.

So the Ninth still keeps quoting United States v. Sutcliffe in error, as witnessed below.

The United States appeals the dismissal of Ortencia Segura-Segura’s indictment on the ground of selective prosecution.

Such a dismissal can only be sustained by “clear evidence” that “(1) other similarly situated individuals have not been prosecuted and (2) [the defendant’s] prosecution was based on an impermissible motive.

United States v. Sutcliffe, 505 F.3d 944, 954 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The perspective of the government by Judge Kozinski

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,


In criminal prosecutions, where guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, the Supreme Court requires a conviction to rest on more than the uncorroborated confession of the defendant or his appointed counsel. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954).

The majority unduly disregards the underlying reason for the very existence of the appeal, that the accused DENIES the charges he transmitted, not falsely admits it on the appeal, or else why even an appeal????

The opinion’s recitation of the facts is inappropriately written from the  perspective of the government by Judge Kozinski, to gain power. Period. The appeal was for show only.

The dissent from the government attempts to minimize the importance of the false confession by taking the position that the facts should be CENSORED.

The problem can be traced back to the failure of today’s judiciary to stand up to clear abuse of governmental authority as well as its unwillingness to protect the fundamental rights of all Americans.

“FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL.” Judge A. Howard Matz

Judges have come to place their reliance on what the government tells them, rather than on what the Constitution requires.

Courts have grown more and more lax in curtailing the excesses of law enforcement, and the judiciary’s record in protecting fundamental rights has become wholly unsatisfactory.

No other case, however, reflects a greater surrender on the part of the courts of the citizens’ fundamental rights simply because it is told “Trust Your Government.” As far as I am concerned, the Constitution demands far more.

Never before have we condoned so great an infringement on the fundamental rights of so many Americans. The government’s rationales are flimsy, at best, and don’t come close to outweighing the recognized interests of free individuals in keeping the entirety of their fundamental rights.

The devils that did are the devils that know.

Tags

, , , , , ,


Judge A Howard Matz In Chambers

Judge A Howard Matz In Chambers

I have tried to even the playing field for the lawyers and attorneys; I have stressed the importance of following the rules fairly and non-abusively. At the same time, the language of law as it is written has to be followed,

For instance, if the verb is ‘shall’ I couldn’t interpret it as ‘may’.

The devils that did are the devils that know.

Gary Winnick owes my family 1,176,047.04 dollars


Gary Winnick owes my family $1,176,047.04 dollars. The way I see it I was working at the time of my false-arrest at 35.00 per hour. So 35.00 per hour, times 33601.344 hours of my life, come out to $1,176,047.04 dollars.

I’ll tell you what, Gary Winnick of Global Double Crossing, we can settle it for $4000.00 dollars.

 

 

One must have priorities after all, right?

Tags

, , , , , , , ,


Judge A. Howard Matz and Eric Holder

Federal Judge A. Howard Matz admits, and I quote,

“The law is pretty clear and I did NOT follow it.”

This is his way of saying he broke the law.

His penalty? NOTHING. Business as usual. His boss Alex “Wizard of Koz” Kozinski just sweeps it under the rug and behind the curtain.

When Matz is exposed he sends a government thug to take down the website, then uses more thugs to erase Facebook pages!

And then when this is exposed he “suddenly retires” to ensure his pension is not taken away. One must have priorities after all, right?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers