Tags
Censor, Censorship, civil rights, Constitution, court, coverup, First Amendment, Fraud, Freedom, Howard Matz, Judge Howard Matz, Judge Matz, judge matz california, judge matz central district, judge matz central district of california, judge matz glendale, judge matz los angeles, Speech, Twitter
I want to make a promise to you the reader, and I don’t know if I can fulfill it tomorrow or even the day after that, but I put the rich and powerful bastards of this world on notice that I do not have their best interest at heart, I will try and speak for my reader, that is my promise, I will take my best shot and it will be a voice of ink and rage against those who would find a way to subvert the rights and interests of the people by fraud and lies.
SIDE BAR:::
THE ACCUSED:
Discovery. I’ve been told there’s 15 CD roms, five more as I addressed here have been reportedly culled, to be added to that discovery. and now I just found out yesterday that there’s an additional three more that they’re bringing in on top of that. So I mean, I believe orders were to turn over all your data, forthwith. I heard it very clearly. For this data keep appearing and when I asked see this data I only get a little bit of the data, if any? If that even is the original data, I don’t know. Because I haven’t seen discovery. I have to prepare for this trial in four weeks.
JUDGE MATZ:
Okay. Mr. Sutcliffe, let me respond by telling you that it isn’t a good thing and is often regrettable thing, it’s seldom a reversible thing that discovery comes out in bits and pieces and drips and drabs. This isn’t the first case and it won’t be the last case today that in criminal cases the government turns over material in increments at different times.” ~Judge Matz, CR 02-350-AHM September 25, 2002
SIDE BAR PART 2, ELEVEN MONTHS LATER:::
JUDGE MATZ:
ALL RIGHT. ONE REASON I TOOK THE BENCH THREE OR FOUR MINUTES LATE THIS AFTERNOON IS I WAS DRAFTING AN ORDER I WAS INTENDED AND TOLD YOU I WOULD ISSUE TO THE PRIOR LAWYERS IN THIS CASE, AND I’M GOING TO TAILOR THAT ORDER TO WHAT I BELIEVE AND NOW UNDERSTAND BASED UPON WHAT THE LAWYERS AND MR. SUTCLIFFE JUST TOLD ME. BECAUSE I AM UTTERLY ASTONISHED, BAFFLED, AND UPSET THAT DESPITE MY EFFORTS AND ORDERS THAT THE MATERIAL HAS NOT BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM ONE LAWYER TO THE SUCCESSIVE LAWYER AND IS NOT IN THE CURRENT POSSESSION OF THE STANDBY LAWYER OR THE DEFENDANT. I DON’T SEE HOW WE CAN PROCEED TO TRIAL, EVEN PUTTING ASIDE ISSUES OF WHO REPRESENTS MR. SUTCLIFFE UNDER THAT STATE OF AFFAIRS AND I DON’T INTEND TO DO SO.” ~JUDGE MATZ: CR 02-350(A)-AHM, August 27, 2003
I am talking about judge howard matz, the howard matz, the corrupted judge matz in the central district of california, you know judge matz of the central district, not judge matz in glendale, but judge matz of california, judge matz in los angeles, that judge.
