He and she who lies in small things, lies in all things….

Tags

A. Howard Matz, Attorney Misconduct, Department of Justice, DOJ, Fraud on the court, Harvard Law School, Howard Matz, Impeachment, Judge A. Howard Matz, Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge Matz, judge matz california, judge matz central district, judge matz los angeles, Justice Department, Legal Ethics, Ninth Circuit, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Sung Park

Observe how on Oct 7, Hizzz Oder, Judge A. Howard Matz, attempts to justify denying assistance of counsel to the accused by claiming the accused “compelled” four previous counsel to quit.

“By his own conduct, Defendant previously compelled four of his prior attorneys to move to withdraw.”

Also note how he tries to claim the accused is “in possession” of the “expert reports” of 3 previous experts which were paid for and hired by the four “compelled to quit” counselors, prior to denying the accused any assistance of counsel.

“Mr. Reed’s  October 3rd declaration establishes that all evidence has now been turned over to Defendant. All evidence in the case is now in Defendant’s direct possession, including the work product of all attorneys, investigators, and experts.“

Compare that to this colloquy with Mr. Reed on Sept. 26

“Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I didn’t go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?”

Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor.”

Judge A. Howard Matz: “Has anybody discussed with you any of his prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?”

Reed: “No, Your Honor.”

One doesn’t need an expert to tell that a fraud on the court was going on in the court of Hizzzz Oder.

Nor does one need an expert, or be a Harvard Law School graduate to know someone lied to the American people. One need only look at the facts of the lie. 

This report was brought to you and paid for through multiple violations of Steven’s fundamental rights by Judge A. Howard Matz.

“FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL” ~Judge A. Howard Matz

Ditto for protecting evidence for the accused!

Missing Zips
Missing HDs
Missing AudioTapes
Missing Files

While everyone was losing files, I managed to find some, based on the prosecutors lie to the court. Keyword is LA-15 

The Compelled Judge Matz | Central District of California.

Tags

A. Howard Matz, Alex Kozinski, Central District, Darcy Smith, Department of Justice, DOJ, Fraud, Fraud on the court, Harvard Law School, Illegal Sentences, Judge Alex Kozinski, judge matz california, judge matz central district of california

Meet Judge Matz Central District of California.

A compelling excuse used by Judge A. Howard Matz to deny The Sixth Amendment Right to Assistance Of Counsel.

LIE:

“By his own conduct, Mr Sutcliffe previously ‘compelled’ four of his prior to attorneys to move to withdraw. ” ~Judge A. Howard Matz

FACTS:

The first two Public Pretenders from the office of Maria Stratton quit of their own free will because their  “unspoken conflict.“

REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, AUGUST 22, 2002

JUDGE MATZ:

Now I can set this down for October 22nd (2002). I mean I wouldn’t want to spend seven days in jail I didn’t wind up having to spend. So I can understand why that might be little preferable to Mr. Sutcliffe than October 29th. But it can’t be done before October 22nd. And Ms. Potashner, if you could do, if you could be ready to, your office and his team could be ready for a full defense on the 29th they could be ready on the 22nd.

MS. POTASHNER:

I agree with Your Honor on that. That’s fine.

REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2002

Now Mr. Sutcliffe and Ms. Bednarski, I’ve got this application which consists of a request by your current lawyers to be relieved of their responsibilities to you as lawyers and to be relieved of their status as counsel of record. And it states without explanation there is an actual conflict of interest that I could only be told about if you were to waive your attorney-client privilege, which your lawyers think you should not do, and that this conflict of interest is distinct.

Ms. Bednarski, are you telling me in plain language that the communications between your office or any member of your office- on the one hand and Mr. Sutcliffe on the other hand have been so impaired that the ability to maintain mutual trust and respect and confidence in each other’s respective obligations and positions has been I shattered?

MS. BEDNARSKI:

Yes.

JUDGE MATZ:

When you hear that being told to me by these lawyers, as you just heard, do you still want them to be your lawyers?

Sutcliffe:

Again, I prepared a statement, anticipating that question. If I may enter that into the record?

AFTER THE STATEMENT WAS READ IN OPEN COURT:

Judge Matz: Mr. Sutcliffe, you obviously oppose their motion to be relieved as your lawyers,…

Actually I begged him to not let them quit…but let’s not dwell on that fact.

The third one appointed quit because of his incompetence after being appointed by the Federal Public Defenders Office (Who just recused their entire office) in the “complex-computer-case.“  Judge Matz knew he was incompetent to deal with such a case, yet allowed the charade to continue until exposed.

The fourth, well he just would not quit, until many months after he and judge Matz FORCED him on the accused. And they did this…

It went downhill quickly after that.

Judge Matz’s buddy, Judge Alex Kozinski, then felt “compelled” to cover it all up by refusing to rehear this.

And allowing this FRAUD ON THE COURT.

Speaking of FORCED compelling…you “need to” see this.  But, I bet 8000 people are not compelled to see this.

You are now compelled to thank Elena and Debra!

Footnote:  Judge  Matz’s comment that he,

“[w]ouldn’t want to spend seven days in jail I didn’t wind up having to spend”

is ironic, since I discovered he was handing out “substantial illegal prison sentences,” even after being told they were illegal. He gave me one of those when he was finished with me, and then refused to correct it, allowing me to spend 2 additional years in Lompoc’s overcrowded maximum-security penitentiary.

I Will Trade You One Red Paper-Clip

Tags

A. Howard Matz, Attorney Misconduct, California, Central District, Darcy Smith, Fraud, Goblin, Harvard Law School, Judge Matz, judge matz california, judge matz central district of california, judge matz los angeles, Justice Department, Legal Ethics, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Prosecutors, Quote of the Day

I will trade you one red paper-clip for a certificate required by law.

Hell, I will even throw in a Goblin to sweeten the deal.

Not good enough?

How about 8000 Social Security numbers, with matching names, addresses plus business and home phone numbers to boot!