A. Howard Matz, Attorney Misconduct, Department of Justice, DOJ, Fraud on the court, Harvard Law School, Howard Matz, Impeachment, Judge A. Howard Matz, Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge Matz, judge matz california, judge matz central district, judge matz los angeles, Justice Department, Legal Ethics, Ninth Circuit, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Sung Park
Observe how on Oct 7, Hizzz Oder, Judge A. Howard Matz, attempts to justify denying assistance of counsel to the accused by claiming the accused “compelled” four previous counsel to quit.
Also note how he tries to claim the accused is “in possession” of the “expert reports” of 3 previous experts which were paid for and hired by the four “compelled to quit” counselors, prior to denying the accused any assistance of counsel.
“Mr. Reed’s October 3rd declaration establishes that all evidence has now been turned over to Defendant. All evidence in the case is now in Defendant’s direct possession, including the work product of all attorneys, investigators, and experts.“
Compare that to this colloquy with Mr. Reed on Sept. 26
“Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I didn’t go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?”
Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor.”
Judge A. Howard Matz: “Has anybody discussed with you any of his prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?”
Reed: “No, Your Honor.”
This report was brought to you and paid for through multiple violations of Steven’s fundamental rights by Judge A. Howard Matz.
“FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL” ~Judge A. Howard Matz
Ditto for protecting evidence for the accused!