The relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U. S., at 362.
This familiar standard gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.
Whoever transmits …
First essential element is transmits...
But that didn’t slow the Selective Prosecution by Judge A. Howard Matz for his good friend Debra Yang by her associate Elena J. Duarte. Now one of them will die first, carrying their lie to the grave. Can you guess which one?
Hint: They are unstable mentally.
I do this with a prayer that the Lord will do what has to be done and guide our actions, and with great reluctance, but also great resolve. I never thought I would be doing this, but I want to expose the truth about this fraud and deception and I would like to have some press and radio on it, immediately and until Kozinski and Matz are called to repentance.
My terms are simple. I have begged you to overturn the horrible decision in U.S. vs Sutcliffe, you have refused to listen or do anything about it, except threaten me and censor me. So I must take matters into my own hands now.
I am going to prove the fraud by publishing all 8000 social security numbers, with their matching date of birth, addresses, phone numbers, etc., that Judge Elena J. Duarte gave me while lying to the courts and the American people she claimed to represent. That is my intent. Not to break the law, but to expose the Fraud on the Court to cover it all up.
I know it will shock and piss off a lot of honest, hard-working people, some to the point of threats, but so be it, the options are over. And like Elena said, I “have to…” And like Darcy says, “Ya made me.”
Stay tuned… because like Judge A. Howard Matz said in open court, “fundamental rights are going to be protected, but not all.“
Judge A. Howard Matz and Alex Kozinski are all for Suppressing Fundamental Human Rights
One starts Suppressing Fundamental Human Rights by saying, “Fundamental Rights are going to be protected, but not all.“ Google it.
So the Ninth still keeps quoting United States v. Sutcliffe in error, as witnessed below.
The United States appeals the dismissal of Ortencia Segura-Segura’s indictment on the ground of selective prosecution.
Such a dismissal can only be sustained by “clear evidence” that “(1) other similarly situated individuals have not been prosecuted and (2) [the defendant’s] prosecution was based on an impermissible motive.”
United States v. Sutcliffe, 505 F.3d 944, 954 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted).
abuse, Alex Kozinski, Censorship, Central District of California, Debra Wong Yang, Fraud on the court, fundamental rights, Judge A. Howard Matz, U.S. Marshal Darcy Smith, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In criminal prosecutions, where guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, the Supreme Court requires a conviction to rest on more than the uncorroborated confession of the defendant or his appointed counsel. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954).
The majority unduly disregards the underlying reason for the very existence of the appeal, that the accused DENIES the charges he transmitted, not falsely admits it on the appeal, or else why even an appeal????
The dissent from the government attempts to minimize the importance of the false confession by taking the position that the facts should be CENSORED.
The problem can be traced back to the failure of today’s judiciary to stand up to clear abuse of governmental authority as well as its unwillingness to protect the fundamental rights of all Americans.
“FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL.” Judge A. Howard Matz
No other case, however, reflects a greater surrender on the part of the courts of the citizens’ fundamental rights simply because it is told “Trust Your Government.” As far as I am concerned, the Constitution demands far more.
Never before have we condoned so great an infringement on the fundamental rights of so many Americans. The government’s rationales are flimsy, at best, and don’t come close to outweighing the recognized interests of free individuals in keeping the entirety of their fundamental rights.
I have tried to even the playing field for the lawyers and attorneys; I have stressed the importance of following the rules fairly and non-abusively. At the same time, the language of law as it is written has to be followed,
For instance, if the verb is ‘shall’ I couldn’t interpret it as ‘may’.
The devils that did are the devils that know.
Gary Winnick owes my family $1,176,047.04 dollars. The way I see it I was working at the time of my false-arrest at 35.00 per hour. So 35.00 per hour, times 33601.344 hours of my life, come out to $1,176,047.04 dollars.
I’ll tell you what, Gary Winnick of Global Double Crossing, we can settle it for $4000.00 dollars.
Alex "Wizard of Koz" Kozinski, Alex Kozinski, erase Facebook pages, exposed, government thug, Judge A. Howard Matz, Judge A. Howard Matz retires, Matz retirement, The law is pretty clear and I did not follow it
Federal Judge A. Howard Matz admits, and I quote,
“The law is pretty clear and I did NOT follow it.”
This is his way of saying he broke the law.
His penalty? NOTHING. Business as usual. His boss Alex “Wizard of Koz” Kozinski just sweeps it under the rug and behind the curtain.
When Matz is exposed he sends a government thug to take down the website, then uses more thugs to erase Facebook pages!
And then when this is exposed he “suddenly retires” to ensure his pension is not taken away. One must have priorities after all, right?
A. Howard Matz, Alex Kozinski, commit, crimes, future crimes, government censorship, ignorance of the law is always an excuse, Judge A. Howard Matz, Judge A. Howard Matz and Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge Alex Kozinski
The answer is simple, and the keys are in your own hands.
“Judge A. Howard Matz and Judge Alex Kozinski are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making their decisions.” Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 653 (1990)
Meaning their ignorance of the law is no excuse.
“The law is pretty clear and I did not follow it.” ~Judge A. Howard Matz
Correction, their ignorance of the law is an excuse.
With Judge A. Howard Matz, ignorance of the law is always an excuse,
Can you say Equal Protection Under The Law?
Can you say Fraud On The Court?
Yuu want/need Killercop.com, the FaceBooks, the “Twitter” and the rest of my domains taken down? The answer is simple, and the keys are in your own hands.
A) Over turn the Conviction for the lack of the jurisdiction and factual lack of the element of “transmits,” and while at it overturn this Fraud on the Court by Sung Bea Park and Alex Kozinski and Co., it’s too late for the “illegal sentence,.” but never too late to do the right thing.
“Fundamental rights are going to be protected, but not all.”