“A pretrial post-arraignment detainee’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment are comparable to a prisoner’s rights under the Eighth Amendment, Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998), so, post-arraignment, the Eighth Amendment “malicious and sadistic” standard applies.”
But not in the courtroom of Judge A. Howard Matz!
A Judge Howard Matz malicious and sadistic standard of justice.

Judge Howard Matz:
You have one, two, three, four, five different police officers at the Manchester Police Department. Five cops who witnessed this torture? Five cops who saw this go down, and did nothing? Five cops who will testify the F.B.I stood by and watched this and laughed?
Killercop:
Yes, Your Honor.
Judge Howard Matz:
That’s in Manchester, New Hampshire?
Killercop:
No asshole, Manchester, England. Of course it is Manchester, New Hampshire, stop stalling while you think about a way to avoid this mess.
Judge Howard Matz:
I am familiar with all of the accusations contentions you’ve made, about the manner in which you were arrested, and treated, the brutality to which you were subject and by which you were victimized…
These are accusations ‘fishing expeditions’ that, on their face, are — each of them — and they will be filed, so the Court of Appeals will see this. They’ll know exactly what you sought. I don’t have the time or the need or the duty to repeat separately each and every one of them. But they are not appropriate exercises of my authority or discretion to, at this stage or at any stage, really, but especially at this stage in this case, require the marshals to serve those [subpoenas]. As to –
Killercop:
May I be heard on those, Your Honor? And about your standard of appropriate exercises of your authority?
Judge Howard Matz:
No. I don’t really need any argument about that. All of your arguments will be preserved.
Killercop:
I don’t want to argue. I just want to make my record.
Judge Howard Matz:
Briefly, then. Go ahead.
Killercop:
Thank you, Your Honor. I want the record to reflect the main reason I want these officers is for impeachment purposes of the two FBI agents who were present in the station and were smiling and laughing while the police were torturing me.
Judge Howard Matz:
I don’t really need any argument about that.

And there you have a cover up, off the record, of a torture and violation of fundamental rights.
While you question Agent Jeffry Raymond Cugno about the choking, be sure to ask him why he said nothing when he learned Elena J. Duarte and Debra Wong Yang GAVE me 8000 plus social security numbers, matching dates of birth, home addresses, phone numbers, and a lot more while prosecuting me for “most likely” posting” social security numbers!! Using that standard they are “most likely” lying to the American people. They sure lied to Judge A. Howard Matz. Not that he was concerned.
Example:

LA-15
Sutcliffe also provided the FBI agents with an additional sixth CD, labeled LA-15, which appears to be an item of original electronic evidence that was returned to defendant during the course of the case and is not covered by the scope of the Order. (See CR 234, Ex. 7, p. 2; CR 329, p 3, n. 1; Declaration Elena J Duarte) STATUS FILING RE: DEFENDANT’S NONCOMPLIANCE, Jan. 20th, 2004
Like this:
Like Loading...